![]() ![]() The best way to explain this reaction would be to attempt to review New Vegas with the old model. I imagine that a devotee of this system would have a similar experience to that of a veteran flat-earthist watching the moon landing in 1968, whilst playing Obsidian's new title Fallout New Vegas: back-muscles contract, stomach churns and spasms, spine transforms into a huge icicle and drips freezing water down your back. They will write a few paragraphs on each piece, culminating in a score from one to ten then the scores from each category will be squeezed together into a rough average, creating a complete score for the game. A reviewer will smash a given game into four shards: Gameplay, Graphics, Lifespan and Sound. Since I started reading game reviews in OPS2 Magazine 10 years ago, the model of evaluation has stayed largely the same. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |